Candace kept saying 'i'll show the actual context and let the listeners decide'. As a listener, I did. She lost hands down. For example she claims she mentions academic discussion with regards to Ukraine when she clearly only brought it up as an example of how to view October 7th. She came over as dishonest and the Rabbi as passionate and correct
It was uphill to begin with a white coded man schooling a black woman.
The Rabbi had a good start with Sachs and should have stopped the history lesson there. Not only did the Rabbi wander after a strong start, he began in the 12thC, making it almost impossible in this format to link it to modern antisemitism and its cover antizionism. His reliance on relativism and the supremacy of lived experience was an incredibly lame way of prosecuting what ought to have been a very strong case.
Owens is a lot smarter than she’s given credit for, doubtless due to the sometimes idiotic positions she’s taken on other issues. It’s troubling that what should have been a clear win for the Rabbi turned into a no score draw and I fear for Israel’s future as a consequence.
Jews are so un-self-aware. The same people who loudly proclaim that mass immigration is OK for the West then act surprised when people take offense at the double standards. It is great for Israel to be a theocratic state and keep out people that don't fit in but that is rayciss for the goyim. The holocausts must be brought up every single time anyone criticizes Israel as if it was the only holocaust ever in history. Anyone ever heard of Armenia? Nazi genocide was the worst thing in history but Palestinian genocide not so much. Chosen people? So I guess the rest of us are not. The AIPAC bribes our politicians to care about a foreign country more than our own. And Americans are supposed to be OK with that?
Candace kept saying 'i'll show the actual context and let the listeners decide'. As a listener, I did. She lost hands down. For example she claims she mentions academic discussion with regards to Ukraine when she clearly only brought it up as an example of how to view October 7th. She came over as dishonest and the Rabbi as passionate and correct
It was uphill to begin with a white coded man schooling a black woman.
The Rabbi had a good start with Sachs and should have stopped the history lesson there. Not only did the Rabbi wander after a strong start, he began in the 12thC, making it almost impossible in this format to link it to modern antisemitism and its cover antizionism. His reliance on relativism and the supremacy of lived experience was an incredibly lame way of prosecuting what ought to have been a very strong case.
Owens is a lot smarter than she’s given credit for, doubtless due to the sometimes idiotic positions she’s taken on other issues. It’s troubling that what should have been a clear win for the Rabbi turned into a no score draw and I fear for Israel’s future as a consequence.
Prediction: what the rabbi did wrong was start a discussion with an unforeseen and jumbled 4+ minute history lesson. :)
Jews are so un-self-aware. The same people who loudly proclaim that mass immigration is OK for the West then act surprised when people take offense at the double standards. It is great for Israel to be a theocratic state and keep out people that don't fit in but that is rayciss for the goyim. The holocausts must be brought up every single time anyone criticizes Israel as if it was the only holocaust ever in history. Anyone ever heard of Armenia? Nazi genocide was the worst thing in history but Palestinian genocide not so much. Chosen people? So I guess the rest of us are not. The AIPAC bribes our politicians to care about a foreign country more than our own. And Americans are supposed to be OK with that?